Quality Commission

Chair: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Mehmet YÜCENURŞEN

Member: Asst. Prof. Dr. Ahmet BAYRAKTAR

Member: Lect. Reyhan YILMAZ

The commission was appointed by Department Board Decision No. 2026/16 dated 25.09.2026. Its decisions are submitted to the Department Board for approval.

Meetings: 2026/1 – 29.09.2026 (news)

Meeting minutes and decisions are available under Reports > Quality Commission Decisions (in Turkish).

Working groups within the quality assurance system operate under the Quality Commission of our School; no separate working groups have been established in our department. Information on the School-level working group is available [here].

Working groups within the quality assurance system operate under the Quality Commission of our School; no separate working groups have been established in our department. Information on the School-level working group is available [here]. Representing our department: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Mehmet YÜCENURŞEN

Working groups within the quality assurance system operate under the Quality Commission of our School; no separate working groups have been established in our department. Information on the School-level working group is available [here]. Representing our department: Asst. Prof. Dr. Ahmet BAYRAKTAR, Lect. Mustafa Kemal BÖGE

Working groups within the quality assurance system operate under the Quality Commission of our School; no separate working groups have been established in our department. Information on the School-level working group is available [here]. Representing our department: Lect. Reyhan YILMAZ

In our department, education, research and development, community contribution and management processes are monitored within the Plan–Do–Check–Act (PDCA) cycle. Measurement results are evaluated by the Department Quality Commission, and the measures taken are reflected in the plan for the following period.

2025-2026 Spring Semester Course Evaluation Survey – PDCA Report

  • Check: The overall score of the Accounting and Tax Applications Program is 4.56, above the School (4.42) and University (4.45) averages on all 11 items. The score rose from 4.47 to 4.56 over two years. Areas for improvement: encouraging participation (B.9), course workload (B.4) and informing students about their progress (B.5).
  • Act: Wider use of active learning methods, review of ECTS workload and assignment calendar, timely sharing of exam and assignment results with feedback, and advance announcement of make-up classes.
  • Plan: The 2026-2027 targets are an overall score of at least 4.60 and at least 4.58 for items B.4, B.5 and B.9. Progress will be monitored under the 2026-2027 Department Quality Action Plan (Department Board Decision No. 2026/18).

The full report (in Turkish) is available in the file below. For PDCA activities at the School level, click here.